한어Русский языкEnglishFrançaisIndonesianSanskrit日本語DeutschPortuguêsΕλληνικάespañolItalianoSuomalainenLatina

in 2024, fudan school of management’s notification of dishonest behavior in rejecting admissions attracted widespread attention. among them, some students violated integrity during the promotion process, which ultimately made it difficult for the school to respond. this not only caused losses to the school, but also had a certain impact on the fate of other students.

what exactly does the act of “letting go” look like? at the beginning of signing the admission commitment letter, these students expressed a kind of "eternal oath" commitment, but in the end they failed to fulfill their commitment, causing the enrollment plan to be disrupted. this is undoubtedly a regrettable phenomenon.

why do students choose to "let go"? on the one hand, it is not difficult to understand what students really think. they may be faced with multiple choices during the promotion process, and may not be able to say "no" when faced with the school's letter of commitment - because they are worried that improper choices will have adverse effects, and they may not have a clear choice at this time. plan.

however, were the students’ actions justified? from the student's perspective, they may be just "protecting their own interests," but students need to be more cautious in the process of exempting admissions to avoid similar situations.

explore new mechanisms to ensure fairness how can this problem be better solved? perhaps you can start from the following aspects:

• establish a more scientific supplementary enrollment mechanism: when students regret, schools should be able to quickly replace other candidates, increasing the school’s choice.
• imitate the deposit mechanism of foreign universities: students are required to pay a certain deposit for admission, which will be refunded or used as a discount for tuition fees after admission.
• multiple rounds of admissions: ensure full admissions and avoid similar situations by lengthening the admissions process.

the mechanism of pushing and exempting admissions gives both schools and students a certain degree of autonomy. however, if the application stage is fully free but the admission process is very strict, then similar problems may not be fundamentally solved.

summarize:

the behavior of "letting pigeons go" is complex. behind it lies multiple factors such as social structure, education system, and students' personal choices. we need to comprehensively analyze and think about the mechanism for recommending and exempting admissions from a social perspective, and formulate more a scientific solution to avoid similar problems from happening again.